Our blog

Why Low iROAS Is Normal (and Even Expected) for Top-of-Funnel Campaigns

7 min read
Written by: Ben Dutter
Ben Dutter Founder and Chief Strategy Officer

Ben Dutter is Chief Strategy Officer at Power Digital and founder of fusepoint, a data and strategy consultancy powered by deep marketing intelligence. He’s spent nearly 20 years driving growth for brands like Amazon, Crocs, and Liquid Death, with a focus on ethical, effective, data-driven marketing.

To Top

When marketers test top-of-funnel (TOF) campaigns like YouTube, TV, or out-of-home (OOH), they often get nervous when incremental return on ad spend (iROAS) comes back “low.”

The truth? That’s normal, and it doesn’t mean the campaign is a failure.

At fusepoint, after running over 1,200 incrementality tests and thousands of models across industries, we’ve learned that low iROAS on TOF campaigns is both common and expected. 

What matters is understanding why it happens, how to set up your tests correctly, and how to interpret results in the context of long-term brand building.

Let’s break it down.

A Few Definitions

Before diving deeper, a quick refresher:

  • TOF campaigns: Tactics designed to drive awareness and consideration (TV, YouTube, OOH, etc.)

  • iROAS (Incremental ROAS): The incremental revenue generated for each dollar of incremental spend (iRev / Spend).

We also distinguish between:

  • Growth tests: Adding new media on top of existing efforts, usually with lower iROAS.

  • Holdout tests: Removing media to measure what happens without it, usually producing higher iROAS.

Why TOF Campaigns Typically Show Low iROAS

Even though it might feel discouraging, lower iROAS on TOF campaigns makes sense, here’s why.

1. New Channels Take Time to Mature

When you launch a net new channel, it doesn’t reach its full potential overnight. It takes time to:

  • Build reach and frequency among the right audience.

  • Stabilize inventory quality and CPMs.

  • Start creating mental availability and brand association.

This maturation process applies whether the channel is inherently TOF (like OOH) or just new to your mix (like TikTok or YouTube). You can’t fairly compare a new, immature channel to something like Meta or Search that’s been optimized for years.

2. Testing Windows Are Often Too Short

Most incrementality tests run for 4–8 weeks, sometimes up to 12. But TOF campaigns don’t usually show their full impact that quickly, especially for high-consideration purchases.

Growth-oriented TOF tactics are designed to layer on top of existing performance channels, which means their impact is gradual and often delayed. We’ve seen campaigns where iROAS improves significantly after the test ends, sometimes doubling or tripling within 6 months.

For example:

Timeframe iROAS
Week 4 (test) $0.25
Week 8 (test) $0.50
Week 12 (post-test) $1.00
Week 24 (post-test) $3.00

Even Google and Ekimetrics found that in some verticals, only half of media impact happens in the first 5 months, with the rest accruing over months 6–24.

How to Set Up TOF Tests the Right Way

So how do you ensure your TOF incrementality tests give you actionable insights?

Include a Long Post-Treatment Window

Don’t stop measuring when the campaign ends. Monitor iROAS well beyond the testing period to capture its full impact.

Hit Your Reach & Frequency Targets

TOF campaigns work by building mental availability, which requires saturating your audience at meaningful R+F levels which is generally reaching at least 15% of your target audience in the affected geo, at a frequency of at least 2x per week across this audience.

Set Realistic Expectations

Understand that some campaigns, especially for high-price or high-consideration categories, may take 12–18 months (yes, months!) to deliver their full ROI.

Takeaways

Here are the key lessons for marketers running TOF campaigns:

  • Don’t panic if your TOF test shows a low iROAS, that’s normal.

  • Make sure tests are designed to give channels a fair shot at maturity and R+F.

  • Measure performance over an extended post-treatment window.

  • Align your expectations with your audience’s consideration cycle.

At fusepoint, we’re often satisfied when a test shows even a modest “floor” at 90% confidence, because it indicates positive momentum. For example, a YouTube test with a 90% CI iROAS range of $0.25–$1.50 is promising, and likely to grow over time.

Conclusion

Top-of-funnel media is critical for long-term brand growth, but it behaves very differently than direct response channels. As long as you structure your tests properly, set the right benchmarks, and measure over the right horizon, even a “low” iROAS at first can be a sign you’re laying the foundation for future success.

Want help designing a smarter TOF testing strategy? Reach out.

Our Editorial Standards

Reviewed for Accuracy

Every piece is fact-checked for precision.

Up-to-Date Research

We reflect the latest trends and insights.

Credible References

 Backed by trusted industry sources.

Actionable & Insight-Driven

Strategic takeaways for real results.